Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 106
Filter
1.
Arch. argent. pediatr ; 121(2): e202202570, abr. 2023. tab, ilus, graf
Article in English, Spanish | LILACS, BINACIS | ID: biblio-1419111

ABSTRACT

El shunt portosistémico congénito es una anomalía vascular venosa que comunica circulación portal y sistémica, por la que se deriva el flujo sanguíneo, salteando el paso hepático. Es una entidad poco frecuente, cuya incidencia varía entre 1/30 000 y 1/50 000 recién nacidos. Puede cursar de forma asintomática o presentarse con complicaciones en la edad pediátrica o, menos frecuente, en la edad neonatal. Ante el diagnóstico, se deberá definir la necesidad de intervención quirúrgica o intravascular para el cierre. Esta decisión depende de las características anatómicas de la malformación, de las manifestaciones clínicas y complicaciones presentes. Se presenta el caso de un paciente de un mes de vida derivado a nuestro centro para estudio de hepatitis colestásica neonatal, con diagnóstico de shunt portosistémico extrahepático. Se realizó cierre intravascular de la lesión con mejoría significativa posterior.


Congenital portosystemic shunt is a venous vascular abnormality that connects portal and systemic circulation, resulting in diversion of the blood flow, bypassing the hepatic passage. It is a rare malformation; its incidence varies from 1:30 000 to 1:50 000 newborns. It may be asymptomatic or present with complications in the pediatric age or, less frequently, in the neonatal age. Upon diagnosis, the need for a surgical or an intravascular intervention for closure should be defined. This decision depends on the malformation anatomical characteristics, clinical manifestations, and complications. We present the case of a 1-month-old patient referred to our center for the study of neonatal cholestatic hepatitis, with a diagnosis of extrahepatic portosystemic shunt. Intravascular closure of the defect was performed with significant subsequent improvement.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Infant, Newborn , Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic , Vascular Malformations/complications , Endovascular Procedures , Hepatitis/diagnosis , Hepatitis/etiology , Portal Vein/abnormalities
2.
Chinese Journal of Hepatology ; (12): 524-531, 2023.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-986163

ABSTRACT

Objective: To investigate the factors influencing total bilirubin elevation and its correlation with UGT1A1 gene polymorphism in the early postoperative period of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). Methods: 104 cases with portal hypertension and esophageal variceal hemorrhage (EVB) treated with elective TIPS treatment were selected as the study subjects and were divided into a bilirubin-elevated group and a normal bilirubin group according to the total bilirubin elevation level during the early postoperative period. Univariate analysis and logistic regression were used to analyze the factors influencing total bilirubin elevation in the early postoperative period. PCR amplification and first-generation sequencing technology were used to detect the polymorphic loci of the UGT1A1 gene promoter TATA box, enhancer c.-3279 T > G, c.211G > A, and c.686C > A. Logistic regression was used to analyze the correlation of four locus alleles and genotypes with elevated total bilirubin in the early postoperative period. Results: Among the 104 cases, 47 patients were in the bilirubin elevated group, including 35 males (74.5%) and 12 females (25.5%), aged (50.72 ± 12.56) years. There were 57 cases in the normal bilirubin group, including 42 males (73.7%) and 15 females (26.3%), aged (51.63 ± 11.10) years. There was no statistically significant difference in age (t = -0.391, P = 0.697) and gender (χ(2) = 0.008, P = 0.928) between the two groups of patients. Univariate analysis revealed that preoperative alanine transaminase (ALT) level (χ(2) = 5.954, P = 0.015), total bilirubin level (χ(2) = 16.638, P < 0.001), MELD score (χ(2) = 10.054, P = 0.018), Child-Pugh score (χ(2) = 6.844, P = 0.022), and postoperative portal vein branch development (χ(2) = 6.738, P = 0.034) were statistically significantly different between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative ALT level, total bilirubin level, and portal vein branch development after TIPS were correlated with the elevated total bilirubin in the early postoperative period. The polymorphism of the c.211G > A locus of the UGT1A1 gene correlation had elevated total bilirubin in the early postoperative period of TIPS. The risk of elevated total bilirubin was increased in the population carrying allele A (P = 0.001, OR = 4.049) in the early postoperative period. Allelic polymorphisms in the TATA box promoter region and enhancer c.-3279 T > G and c.686C > A had no statistically significant difference between the bilirubin-elevated group and the normal bilirubin group. Conclusion: The preoperative ALT level, total bilirubin level, and portal vein branch development are correlated with the elevated total bilirubin in early postoperative patients. The polymorphisms of the UGT1A1 gene and enhancer c.211G > A are correlated with the occurrence of elevated total bilirubin in the early postoperative period of TIPS. Allele A carrier may have a higher risk of elevated total bilirubin in the early postoperative period.


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Bilirubin , Esophageal and Gastric Varices , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/surgery , Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic , Postoperative Period , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Glucuronosyltransferase/genetics
3.
Chinese Journal of Hepatology ; (12): 90-95, 2023.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-970957

ABSTRACT

Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of transmesenteric vein extrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TEPS) and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in the treatment of cavernous transformation of the portal vein (CTPV). Methods: The clinical data of CTPV patients with patency or partial patency of the superior mesenteric vein treated with TIPS or TEPS treatment in the Department of Vascular Surgery of Henan Provincial People's Hospital from January 2019 to December 2021 were selected. The differences in baseline data, surgical success rate, complication rate, incidence rate of hepatic encephalopathy, and other related indicators between TIPS and TEPS group were statistically analyzed by independent sample t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Chi-square test. Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to calculate the cumulative patency rate of the shunt and the recurrence rate of postoperative portal hypertension symptoms in both groups. Results: The surgical success rate (100% vs. 65.52%), surgical complication rate (6.67% vs. 36.84%), cumulative shunt patency rate (100% vs. 70.70%), and cumulative symptom recurrence rate (0% vs. 25.71%) of the TEPS group and TIPS group were statistically significantly different (P < 0.05). The time of establishing the shunt [28 (2141) min vs. 82 (51206) min], the number of stents used [1 (12) vs. 2 (15)], and the length of the shunt [10 (912) cm vs. 16 (1220) cm] were statistically significant between the two groups (t = -3.764, -4.059, -1.765, P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative hepatic encephalopathy in the TEPS group and TIPS group was 6.67% and 15.79% respectively, with no statistically significant difference (Fisher's exact probability method, P = 0.613). The pressure of superior mesenteric vein decreased from (29.33 ± 1.99) mmHg to (14.60 ± 2.80) mmHg in the TEPS group and from (29.68 ± 2.31) mmHg to (15.79 ± 3.01) mmHg in TIPS group after surgery, and the difference was statistically significant (t = 16.625, 15.959, P < 0.01). Conclusion: The best indication of TEPS is in CTPV patients with patency or partial patency of the superior mesenteric vein. TEPS improves the accuracy and success rate of surgery and reduces the incidence of complications.


Subject(s)
Humans , Portal Vein/surgery , Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic/methods , Hepatic Encephalopathy/etiology , Treatment Outcome , Hypertension, Portal/complications , Retrospective Studies , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology
5.
Rev. med. Chile ; 150(7): 879-888, jul. 2022. tab, ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1424156

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a common complication of cirrhosis associated with a reduced survival. The presence of high-flux spontaneous porto-systemic shunts can induce HE even in patients with preserved liver function. AIM: To evaluate the effect of spontaneous porto-systemic shunt embolization (SPSE) over HE and its long-term evolution. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 11 patients (91% males) with severe HE non-responsive to medical treatment in whom a SPSE was performed. The grade of HE (employing West Haven score), survival, MELD and Child-Pugh score, ammonia levels, degree of disability (employing the modified Rankin scale (mRs)) were evaluated before and at thirty days after procedure. RESULTS: The most common etiology found was non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (63.6%). A reduction of at least two score points of HE was observed in all patients after thirty days. There was a significant reduction on median (IQR) West Haven score from 3 (2-3) at baseline to 1 (0-1) after the procedure (p < 0.01). Twelve months survival was 63.6%. There was a decrease in median ammonia level from 106.5 (79-165) (ug/dL) to 56 (43-61) after SPSE (p = 0.006). The median mRS score before and after the procedure was 3 (3-5) and 1 (1-2.5), respectively (p < 0.01). Conclusions: According to our experience, SPSE is a feasible and effective alternative to improve HE and functionality of patients with refractory EH.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Hepatic Encephalopathy/etiology , Hepatic Encephalopathy/therapy , Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Ammonia , Liver Cirrhosis/complications
6.
Chinese Journal of Hepatology ; (12): 207-212, 2022.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-935928

ABSTRACT

Objective: To investigate the effects of plasma lipopolysaccharide (LPS) concentration changes on platelet release of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and thrombospondin (TSP)-1 in patients with decompensated cirrhotic portal hypertension after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure. Methods: 169 cases with cirrhotic portal hypertension were enrolled, of which 81 cases received TIPS treatment. LPS, VEGF, and TSP-1 concentrations with different Child-Pugh class in peripheral blood plasma of patients were measured. After pre-incubation of normal human platelets with different concentrations of LPS and stimulated by collagen in vitro, platelet PAC-1 expression rate, VEGF, and TSP-1 concentrations were detected. PAC-1 expression rate and the concentrations of LPS, VEGF and TSP-1 in peripheral blood plasma of patients before and after TIPS procedure were detected. The relationship between plasma LPS, VEGF and TSP-1 concentrations and Child-Pugh score changes in patients after TIPS procedure was analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed by t-test, one-way ANOVA or Pearson's rho according to different data. Results: Plasma LPS and TSP-1 concentrations were significantly higher in Child-Pugh class C patients than class A and B, but the concentration of plasma VEGF was significantly lower than class A and B (P < 0.01). In vitro experiments showed that concentration of LPS, TSP-1, and platelet PAC-1 expression rate was higher in the supernatant, but the difference in the concentration of VEGF in the supernatant was not statistically significant. Portal vein pressure and platelet activation were significantly decreased (P < 0.01) in patients after TIPS procedure. Portal venous pressure, platelet activation, plasma LPS, and TSP-1 levels were significantly decreased continuously, while VEGF levels were significantly increased continuously after TIPS procedure. Plasma LPS concentration was positively correlated with TSP-1 concentration (r = 0.506, P < 0.001), and negatively correlated with VEGF concentration (r = -0.167, P = 0.010). Child-Pugh score change range was negatively correlated with change range of plasma VEGF concentration (r = -0.297, P = 0.016), and positively correlated with change range of plasma TSP-1 concentration (r = 0.145, P = 0.031) after TIPS. Conclusion: Portal venous pressure gradient, plasma LPS concentration and corresponding platelet activation was decreased in cirrhotic portal hypertension after TIPS procedure, and with TSP-1 reduction and VEGF elevation it is possible to reduce the liver function injury caused by portal venous shunt.


Subject(s)
Humans , Blood Platelets , Hypertension, Portal/etiology , Lipopolysaccharides , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Plasma , Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic/adverse effects , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
7.
Hepatología ; 2(2): 341-354, 2021. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS, COLNAL | ID: biblio-1396508

ABSTRACT

La trombosis de la vena porta (TVP) se define como una oclusión parcial o completa de la luz de la vena porta o sus afluentes por la formación de trombos. La etiología de la formación de TVP en un hígado cirrótico parece ser multifactorial, y presenta una prevalencia de 1,3% a 9,8%. La fisiopatología de la TVP en pacientes con cirrosis aún no se comprende completamente, pero se sabe que existe una disminución de la síntesis tanto de factores procoagulantes como de anticoagulantes, que asociados a factores de riesgo locales o sistémicos, favorecen el predominio de los procoagulantes que causan la trombosis. Establecer el momento de la instauración de la trombosis y el nivel anatómico dentro del sistema venoso espleno-mesentérico, son aspectos fundamentales para estimar el pronóstico y ayudar a la toma de decisiones terapéuticas. A pesar de que hasta la fecha no se ha publicado un consenso sobre su profilaxis o tratamiento en la cirrosis hepática, y existen muchas controversias con respecto al manejo óptimo de la TVP, se han observado beneficios generales de la anticoagulación con heparina de bajo peso molecular en pacientes con cirrosis hepática, en particular en aquellos con TVP aguda. El objetivo de esta revisión es explorar los temas más relevantes al momento de abordar un paciente con cirrosis hepática y TVP.


Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is defined as a partial or complete occlusion of the lumen of the portal vein or its tributaries due to the formation of thrombi. The etiology of DVT formation in a cirrhotic liver appears to be multifactorial, with a prevalence of 1.3% to 9.8%. The pathophysiology of PVT in patients with cirrhosis is not yet fully understood, but it is known that there is a decrease in the synthesis of both procoagulant and anticoagulant factors, which associated with local or systemic risk factors, favor the predominance of procoagulants that cause thrombosis. Establishing the onset of thrombosis and the anatomical level within the splanchnic mesenteric venous system are fundamental aspects to estimate the prognosis and aid in therapeutic decision-making. Despite the fact that to date no consensus has been published on its prophylaxis or treatment in liver cirrhosis, and the many controversies regarding the optimal management of PVT, general benefits of anticoagulation with low molecular weight heparin have been observed in patients with liver cirrhosis, particularly those with acute PVT. The objective of this review is to explore the most relevant issues when approaching a patient with liver cirrhosis and PVT.


Subject(s)
Humans , Portal Vein , Venous Thrombosis/complications , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Risk Factors , Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic , Venous Thrombosis/classification , Venous Thrombosis/therapy , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use
8.
J. vasc. bras ; 20: e20200133, 2021. graf
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1287075

ABSTRACT

Resumo A síndrome de Budd-Chiari é uma doença venosa hepática rara, mais incidente em adultos jovens, podendo se apresentar na forma aguda, subaguda ou crônica, o que resulta em hipertensão portal. O tratamento tradicional consiste em técnicas de trombólise e de shunts portossistêmicos intra-hepáticos, como pontes para o transplante hepático. Recentemente, técnicas de angioplastia com balão ou stents têm sido relatadas para o tratamento dessa afecção. Neste artigo, é relatado e discutido um caso de síndrome de Budd-Chiari por obstrução membranosa da via de saída da veia supra-hepática com trombose da veia hepática média em uma paciente de 24 anos. O tratamento estabelecido foi a angioplastia transjugular com balão, que obteve resultados satisfatórios e boa evolução clínica.


Abstract The Budd-Chiari syndrome is a rare hepatic venous disease. It is more prevalent in young adults and may present in acute, subacute, or chronic forms, causing portal hypertension. Traditional treatment consists of thrombolysis techniques and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, as a bridge to liver transplantation. Recently, use of balloon or stent angioplasty techniques has been reported for treatment of this condition. In this article, we report and discuss a case of BCS by membranous obstruction in the hepatic vein outflow tract, with middle hepatic vein thrombosis, in a 24-year-old patient. The treatment chosen and employed was transjugular balloon angioplasty, which achieved satisfactory results and good clinical evolution.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adult , Young Adult , Angioplasty, Balloon/methods , Budd-Chiari Syndrome/surgery , Stents , Thrombolytic Therapy , Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic , Endovascular Procedures , Hepatic Veins , Hypertension, Portal
9.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 148(8)ago. 2020.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1389288

ABSTRACT

Chylous Ascites (CA) and chylothorax (CTx) are associated with obstruction, disruption or insufficiency of the lymphatic system. We report a 68-year-old male, with a history of alcoholic cirrhosis, who had recurrent events of CTx and CA. After a complete study, no other etiologies other than portal hypertension were found. Therapy with diuretics, nothing per mouth, parenteral feeding plus octreotide did not relieve symptoms. A transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) was successfully placed and pleural effusion subsided. This case shows that CA and CTx can be caused by portal hypertension and they may subside employing a multimodal management strategy.


Subject(s)
Aged , Humans , Male , Chylous Ascites , Chylothorax , Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic , Hypertension, Portal , Ascites , Chylous Ascites/etiology , Chylous Ascites/therapy , Chylothorax/therapy , Treatment Outcome , Liver Cirrhosis
10.
Hepatología ; 1(1): 56-67, 2020. tab, ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS, COLNAL | ID: biblio-1396651

ABSTRACT

El síndrome de Budd-Chiari (SBC), descrito en 1845, se define como la obstrucción del flujo venoso hepático en ausencia de enfermedad cardíaca o pericárdica. En Colombia no se tienen datos epidemiológicos claros de esta patología, la cual alrededor del mundo se considera poco frecuente. Se diagnostica al demostrar la obstrucción del flujo de las venas hepáticas. Tiene diversas manifestaciones clínicas como fiebre, ascitis, dolor abdominal y circulación colateral, entre otras. En ciertos casos es asintomática y en su gran mayoría se acompaña de patologías protrombóticas. El manejo inicial depende de la condición del paciente; sin embargo, se ha propuesto el manejo escalonado, donde se inicia con anticoagulación, se continúa con angioplastia, luego con desvío portosistémico intrahepático transyugular (TIPS), y se termina con trasplante hepático. El pronóstico depende de un diagnóstico precoz y un tratamiento adecuado. En las mejores circunstancias se alcanza una sobrevida a cinco años en el 90% de los casos, mientras que en ausencia de manejo, la tasa de mortalidad a un año alcanza el mismo porcentaje.


Budd-Chiari syndrome (SBC), described in 1845, is defined as the obstruction of hepatic venous flow in the absence of heart or pericardial disease. In Colombia there are no clear epidemiological data of this pathology, that around the world is considered rare. It is diagnosed by demonstrating the obstruction of the flow of the hepatic veins. It has various clinical manifestations such as fever, ascites, abdominal pain and collateral circulation, among others. In certain cases, it is asymptomatic but in the great majority it is accompanied by prothrombotic pathologies. Initial management depends on the patient's condition; however, staggered management has been proposed, beginning with anticoagulation, continuing with angioplasty, then with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), and finally, with liver transplantation. The prognosis depends on an early diagnosis and proper treatment. In the best circumstances, a five-year survival is achieved in 90% of cases, while in the absence of treatment, the one-year mortality rate reaches the same percentage.


Subject(s)
Humans , Budd-Chiari Syndrome/therapy , Prognosis , Liver Transplantation , Angioplasty , Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic , Budd-Chiari Syndrome/diagnosis , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use
11.
Rev. gastroenterol. Perú ; 39(1): 64-69, ene.-mar. 2019. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1014127

ABSTRACT

El hidrotórax hepático (HH) se define como un derrame pleural mayor de 500 ml en pacientes con cirrosis e hipertensión portal. Representa una complicación infrecuente por lo general asociada con ascitis y su origen se relaciona con el paso de líquido ascítico a través de pequeños defectos en el diafragma de predominio en el hemitórax derecho. Una vez establecido el diagnóstico por imágenes, la toracentesis diagnostica permite confirmar un trasudado. La terapia inicial está basada en la restricción de sodio y el uso combinado de diuréticos. El 20-25% de los pacientes desarrolla un HH refractario, el cual requiere intervenciones invasivas tales como la derivación percutánea portosistémica intrahepática (DPPI), la reparación de los defectos diafragmáticos por videotoracoscopia asistida asociada a pleurodésis química y el uso de un catéter pleural tunelizado. No se recomienda la inserción de un tubo de tórax por su elevada morbilidad y mortalidad. El tratamiento definitivo del HH es el trasplante hepático el cual alcanza una excelente sobrevida. Presentamos tres casos de hidrotórax hepático con diferentes enfoques terapéuticos que incluyeron el manejo conservador con dieta y diuréticos, la inserción fallida de un tubo de tórax con pleurodesis y una DPPI.


Hepatic hydrothorax is uncommon transudative pleural effusion greater than 500 ml in association with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Ascites is also present in most of the patients and the pathophysiology include the passage of ascites fluid through small diaphragmatic defects. After diagnostic thoracentesis studies, the first line management is restricting sodium intake and diuretics combination including stepwise dose of spironolactone plus furosemide. Therapeutic thoracentesis is a simple and effective procedure to relief dyspnea. Hepatic hydrothorax is refractory in approximately 20-25% and treatments options include repeated thoracentesis, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) placement, chemical pleurodesis with repair diaphragmatic defects using video-assisted thoracoscopy surgery (VATS), and insertion of an indwelling pleural catheter. Chest tube insertion carries significant morbidity and mortality with questionable benefit. Hepatic transplantation remains the best treatment option with long term survival. We present three cases of hepatic hydrothorax with different therapeutic approach including first line management, failed chest tube insertion and TIPS placement.


Subject(s)
Aged , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Hydrothorax/therapy , Pleural Effusion/therapy , Ascites/therapy , Chest Tubes , Liver Transplantation , Hepatitis C/complications , Combined Modality Therapy , Pleurodesis , Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic , Metabolic Syndrome/complications , Diuretics/therapeutic use , Thoracentesis , Conservative Treatment , Hydrothorax/surgery , Hydrothorax/etiology , Hypertension, Portal/complications , Liver Cirrhosis/complications
12.
urol. colomb. (Bogotá. En línea) ; 28(2): 130-141, 2019. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS, COLNAL | ID: biblio-1402320

ABSTRACT

Zoom Image Resumen Introducción y Objetivos La biopsia transrectal de la próstata (BTRP), fue propuesta por primera vez en 1937 y hasta 1981 se realizó la primera biopsia ecodirigida, actualmente es la vía de acceso a la próstata más utilizada por su fácil curva de aprendizaje como por el alto rendimiento diagnóstico, sin embargo, en el Reino Unido, el 68% de los urólogos no realizan BTRP porque consideran que no han recibido suficiente entrenamiento. El objetivo de este estudio es describir las diferentes técnicas utilizadas en la actualidad, las complicaciones del procedimiento y aportar una guía de consejos y trucos implementada en varios centros de referencia a la hora de realizar una BTRP para prevenir complicaciones, mejorar el desempeño de la prueba y del urólogo y estandarizar el método de toma de la BTRP. Materiales y Métodos Realizamos una búsqueda en las bases de datos de PubMed, MEDLINE, SciELO utilizando las palabras claves "Transrectal ultrasound biopsy of the prostate" "tips and tricks" "Transperineal biopsy of the prostate" "Magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy" "MRI/US fusion biopsy", basados en la literatura y en la experiencia de los autores de más de 1100 biopsias anuales entre los diferentes centros de referencia. Brindamos una guía práctica de consejos y trucos para facilitar el desempeño del urólogo en la BTRP. Resultados La biopsia transrectal de próstata ecodirigida continúa siendo la primera opción para el abordaje diagnóstico del paciente con sospecha clínica de cáncer de próstata, es de gran importancia estandarizar el esquema de toma de la biopsia, y en nuestro caso recomendamos utilizar un esquema de 12 cores, definir la profilaxis antibióticas y la duración del tratamiento, y el uso de analgesia o anestesia local. Presentamos los consejos y trucos que hemos utilizado en nuestra práctica clínica en varios centros de referencia.


Introduction Transrectal biopsy of the prostate was described for the first time in 1937, and it was not until 1981 the first transrectal biopsy of the prostate was done using transrectal ultrasound to guide the procedure. Nowadays it is the most popular technique to obtain prostatic tissue when suspecting adenocarcinoma of the prostate, this due to its easy learning curve and to its excellent diagnostic performance. Up to 68% of urologist in the UK do not do prostate biopsy arguing they have not received enough training The aim of this article is to describe the different techniques, the physics of ultrasonography and a practical guide of tips and tricks from a center where we performed up to 1100 transrectal ultrasound biopsies annually, aiming to improve the diagnostic performance and lower the complicacion rates of the biopsy. Methods We performed a search in PubMed, MEDLINE, SciELO using the keywords "Transrectal ultrasound biopsy of the prostate" "tips and tricks" "Transperineal biopsy of the prostate""Magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy" "MRI/US fusion biopsy," and base on the literature review and our experience of more than a thousand biopsies annually we wrote this article. Results TRUS biopsy of the prostate continue to be the first choice in the urologist armamentarium to diagnose the patient with clinical suspicion of prostate cáncer, with a low complication rate, a good diagnostic performance and an easy learning curve. It is necessary to standardized the procedure, perform a doble sextant biopsy, define the best antibiotic prophylaxis, the technique for anesthesia/analgesia. Here we present our practical guide of tips and tricks.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms , Biopsy , Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic , Prostate , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Review Literature as Topic , Adenocarcinoma , Ultrasonography , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Information Services
13.
Chinese Journal of Hepatology ; (12): 582-593, 2019.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-773065

ABSTRACT

Portal hypertension(PH) is one of the main complications of cirrhosis.Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt(TIPS) is the percutaneous creation of a conduit from the hepatic vein to the portal vein that is used to manage consequences of PH (i.e., variceal bleeding and refractory ascites) and used as a bridging therapy to liver transplant for decompensated cirrhosis. The following Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) presents profession associational recommendations of the Chinese College of Interventionalists(CCI) on TIPS for PH. The CPGs was written by more than 30 experts in the field of TIPS in China (including interventional radiologists, liver surgeons, hepatologists and gastroenterologist, et al.). The panel of experts, produced these CPGs using evidence from PubMed and Cochrane database searches and combined with relevant expert consensuses and high quality clinical researches in China providing up to date guidance on TIPS for PH with the only purpose of improving clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Humans , China , Esophageal and Gastric Varices , Therapeutics , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage , Therapeutics , Hypertension, Portal , Therapeutics , Liver Cirrhosis , Therapeutics , Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic , Treatment Outcome
14.
Chinese Medical Journal ; (24): 1087-1099, 2019.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-772196

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND@#Portosystemic shunts, including surgical portosystemic shunts and transjugular intra-hepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), may have benefit over endoscopic therapy (ET) for treatment of variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension; however, whether there being a survival benefit among them remains unclear. This study was to compare the effect of three above-mentioned therapies on the short-term and long-term survival in patient with cirrhosis.@*METHODS@#Using the terms "variceal hemorrhage or variceal bleeding or variceal re-bleeding" OR "esophageal and gastric varices" OR "portal hypertension" and "liver cirrhosis," the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Embase, and the references of identified trials were searched for human randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in any language with full texts or abstracts (last search June 2017). Risk ratio (RR) estimates with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using random effects model by Review Manager. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for the assessment of the risk of bias.@*RESULTS@#Twenty-six publications comprising 28 RCTs were included in this analysis. These studies included a total of 2845 patients: 496 (4 RCTs) underwent either surgical portosystemic shunts or TIPS, 1244 (9 RCTs) underwent either surgical portosystemic shunts or ET, and 1105 (15 RCTs) underwent either TIPS or ET. There was no significant difference in overall mortality and 30-day or 6-week survival among three interventions. Compared with TIPS and ET, separately, surgical portosystemic shunts were both associated with a lower bleeding-related mortality (RR = 0.07, 95% CI = 0.01-0.32; P < 0.001; RR = 0.17, 95% CI = 0.06-0.51, P < 0.005) and rate of variceal re-bleeding (RR = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.10-0.51, P < 0.001; RR = 0.10, 95% CI = 0.04-0.24, P < 0.001), without a significant difference in the rate of postoperative hepatic encephalopathy (RR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.25-1.00, P = 0.14; RR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.59-2.01, P = 0.78). TIPS showed a trend toward lower variceal re-bleeding (RR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.36-0.58, P < 0.001), but a higher incidence of hepatic encephalopathy than ET (RR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.34-2.36, P < 0.001).@*CONCLUSIONS@#The overall analysis revealed that there seem to be no short-term and long-term survival advantage, but surgical portosystemic shunts are with the lowest bleeding-related mortality among the three therapies. Surgical portosystemic shunts may be the most effective without an increased risk of hepatic encephalopathy and TIPS is superior to ET but at the cost of a higher incidence of hepatic encephalopathy. However, some of findings should be interpreted with caution due to the lower level of evidence and the existence of significant heterogeneity.


Subject(s)
Humans , Confidence Intervals , Esophageal and Gastric Varices , Pathology , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage , Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
15.
Gut and Liver ; : 704-713, 2018.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-718116

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Gastric varices (GVs) are a major cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis. The current treatments of choice are balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) and the placement of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). We aimed to compare the efficacy and outcomes of these two methods for the management of GV bleeding. METHODS: This retrospective study included consecutive patients who received BRTO (n=157) or TIPS (n=19) to control GV bleeding from January 2005 to December 2014 at a single tertiary hospital in Korea. The overall survival (OS), immediate bleeding control rate, rebleeding rate and complication rate were compared between patients in the BRTO and TIPS groups. RESULTS: Patients in the BRTO group showed higher immediate bleeding control rates (p=0.059, odds ratio [OR]=4.72) and lower cumulative rebleeding rates (log-rank p=0.060) than those in the TIPS group, although the difference failed to reach statistical significance. There were no significant differences in the rates of complications, including pleural effusion, aggravation of esophageal varices, portal hypertensive gastropathy, and portosystemic encephalopathy, although the rate of the progression of ascites was significantly higher in the BRTO group (p=0.02, OR=7.93). After adjusting for several confounding factors using a multivariate Cox analysis, the BRTO group had a significantly longer OS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]=0.44, p=0.01) and a longer rebleeding-free survival (aHR=0.34, p=0.001) than the TIPS group. CONCLUSIONS: BRTO provides better bleeding control, rebleeding-free survival, and OS than TIPS for patients with GV bleeding.


Subject(s)
Humans , Ascites , Esophageal and Gastric Varices , Hemorrhage , Hepatic Encephalopathy , Korea , Liver Cirrhosis , Odds Ratio , Pleural Effusion , Portasystemic Shunt, Surgical , Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers
16.
Gastrointestinal Intervention ; : 167-171, 2018.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-739174

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation for the management of portal hypertension in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: A literature search of the MEDLINE/PubMed and Embase databases was conducted. All articles reporting the outcomes of TIPS creation for variceal bleeding and refractory ascites and hepatic hydrothorax in patients with HCC were included. Exclusion criteria were non-English language, sample size < 5, data not extractable, and data reported in another article. RESULTS: A total of 280 patients (mean age, 48–58; male gender, 66%) from five articles were included. TIPS creation was performed for variceal bleeding in 79% and refractory ascites and/or hepatic hydrothorax in 26% of patients. Technical and clinical success was achieved in 99% and 64% of patients, respectively. Clinical failure occurred in 36% of patients due to rebleeding or recurrent bleeding (n = 77) or no resolution or improvement of refractory ascites and hepatic hydrothorax (n = 24). One percent of patient had major complications, including accelerated liver failure (n = 1) and multi-organ failure resulting from hemorrhagic shock (n = 1), all of which resulted in early (i.e., within 30 days) death. Hepatic encephalopathy occurred in 40% of patients after TIPS creation. Lung metastasis was found 1% of patient 5 months (n = 1) and 72 months (n = 1) after TIPS creation. CONCLUSION: TIPS creation seems to be safe and effective for the management of portal hypertension in patients with HCC.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Ascites , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Esophageal and Gastric Varices , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage , Hemorrhage , Hepatic Encephalopathy , Hydrothorax , Hypertension, Portal , Liver Failure , Liver Neoplasms , Lung , Neoplasm Metastasis , Portasystemic Shunt, Surgical , Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic , Sample Size , Shock, Hemorrhagic
17.
Clinics ; 72(7): 405-410, July 2017. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-890707

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To present the clinical features and outcomes of outpatients who suffer from refractory ascites. METHODS: This prospective observational study consecutively enrolled patients with cirrhotic ascites who submitted to a clinical evaluation, a sodium restriction diet, biochemical blood tests, 24 hour urine tests and an ascitic fluid analysis. All patients received a multidisciplinary evaluation and diuretic treatment. Patients who did not respond to the diuretic treatment were controlled by therapeutic serial paracentesis, and a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt was indicated for patients who required therapeutic serial paracentesis up to twice a month. RESULTS: The most common etiology of cirrhosis in both groups was alcoholism [49 refractory (R) and 11 non-refractory ascites (NR)]. The majority of patients in the refractory group had Child-Pugh class B cirrhosis (p=0.034). The nutritional assessment showed protein-energy malnutrition in 81.6% of the patients in the R group and 35.5% of the patients in the NR group, while hepatic encephalopathy, hernia, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, upper digestive hemorrhage and type 2 hepatorenal syndrome were present in 51%, 44.9%, 38.8%, 38.8% and 26.5% of the patients in the R group and 9.1%, 18.2%, 0%, 0% and 0% of the patients in the NR group, respectively (p=0.016, p=0.173, p=0.012, p=0.012, and p=0.100, respectively). Mortality occurred in 28.6% of the patients in the R group and in 9.1% of the patients in the NR group (p=0.262). CONCLUSION: Patients with refractory ascites were malnourished, suffered from hernias, had a high prevalence of complications and had a high postoperative death frequency, which was mostly due to infectious processes.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Ascites/surgery , Paracentesis , Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic , Ambulatory Care , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
18.
Ann. hepatol ; 16(1): 140-148, Jan.-Feb. 2017. graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-838096

ABSTRACT

Abstract: Introduction and aim. Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a common complication of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting (TIPS). It is associated with a reduced quality of life and poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to compare two groups of patients who did and did not develop overt HE after TIPS. We looked for differences between these groups before TIPS. Material and methods. A study of 895 patients was conducted based on a retrospective analysis of clinical data. Data was analyzed using Fisher’s exact test, χ2, Mann Whitney test, unpaired t-test and logistic regression. After the initial analyses, we have looked at a regression models for the factors associated with development of HE after TIPS. Results. 257 (37.9%) patients developed HE after TIPS. Patients’ age, pre-TIPS portal venous pressure, serum creatinine, aspartate transaminase, albumin, presence of diabetes mellitus and etiology of portal hypertension were statistically significantly associated with the occurrence of HE after TIPS (p < 0.01). However, only the age, pre-TIPS portal venous pressure, serum creatinine, presence of diabetes mellitus and etiology of portal hypertension contributed to the regression model. Patients age, serum creatinine, presence of diabetes mellitus and portal vein pressure formed the model describing development of HE after TIPS for a subgroup of patients with refractory ascites. Conclusion. We have identified, using a substantial sample, several factors associated with the development of HE after TIPS. This could be helpful in further research.


Subject(s)
Humans , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Hepatic Encephalopathy/etiology , Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic/adverse effects , Hypertension, Portal/surgery , Time Factors , Venous Pressure , Biomarkers/blood , Chi-Square Distribution , Logistic Models , Hepatic Encephalopathy/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Age Factors , Treatment Outcome , Czech Republic , Creatinine/blood , Diabetes Complications/etiology , Hypertension, Portal/diagnosis , Hypertension, Portal/etiology , Hypertension, Portal/physiopathology
19.
Medical Principles and Practice. 2017; 26 (3): 286-288
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-188536

ABSTRACT

Objective: To report on 2 patients with alcoholic cirrhosis who were treated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt [TIPS] placement


Clinical Presentation and Intervention: The 2 patients had a history of alcoholic cirrhosis, and TIPS surgery was performed on them. In both cases, 4 months after TIPS placement, proteinuria was observed along with histological alterations characteristic of immune complex membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis [MPGN]


Conclusion: The TIPS in one patient was successful without Immediate complications, while the other patient was referred for a combined liver-kidney transplant. In both cases, immune complex MPGN might have developed after TIPS placement probably due to a reduced immune complex


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Glomerulonephritis, Membranoproliferative , Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic/statistics & numerical data , Proteinuria , Kidney Transplantation , Liver Transplantation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL